<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Apple&#8217;s PC auto-update rocks my world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elihorne.com/blog/journal/why-apples-pc-auto-update-rocks-my-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elihorne.com/journal/why-apples-pc-auto-update-rocks-my-world/</link>
	<description>Design. Develop. Deploy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DavidK</title>
		<link>http://elihorne.com/journal/why-apples-pc-auto-update-rocks-my-world/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 02:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elihorne.com/?p=212#comment-499</guid>
		<description>You know I ran into this article and find making such a fuss over Apple&#039;s approach not so bad. At least you have a choice in whether you want to install it or not. Take a look at this article: http://www.macworld.com/article/132633/2008/03/bloadtware.html

Now that&#039;s sad!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I ran into this article and find making such a fuss over Apple&#8217;s approach not so bad. At least you have a choice in whether you want to install it or not. Take a look at this article: <a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/132633/2008/03/bloadtware.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.macworld.com/article/132633/2008/03/bloadtware.html</a></p>
<p>Now that&#8217;s sad!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Katt</title>
		<link>http://elihorne.com/journal/why-apples-pc-auto-update-rocks-my-world/comment-page-1/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>James Katt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 00:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elihorne.com/?p=212#comment-498</guid>
		<description>I think Apple is right.

I think Mozilla&#039;s CEO is jealous and feels threatened by the possibility that Safari will be installed in more PCs than Firefox is.

Those who think Apple is wrong are assuming that PC users are stupid.  Of course, Mac Users tend to have a higher IQ, are more educated, and are more affluent than PC Users.  But PC Users are not stupid.  They have had to tolerate viruses.  They have had to develop a paranoia about adware, malware, viruses, worms and other infectious software which degrade a PC&#039;s performance.  Thus they are alert about updates.  It is a simple matter of unchecking Safari if one does not want it.  DUH.  Big deal.

The more Safari is installed and used, the less the grip and monopoly that Microsoft has on the PC World.  Safari is the only browser to have an A+ rating on Acid3.  It is the most standards compliant browser.

You have to fight fire-with-fire sometimes.  Certainly Microsoft has done things that are far more nefarious and Borg-like.  Just browsing the web using Internet Explorer is a huge invitation to install lots of malware on your PC.  Various irritating search bars are examples of some software which can be loaded.  Certainly adware can also be automatically downloaded.

This subject is a tempest in a molehill.  The update is clearly marked and explained.  The user has options - to install or not install.

Go Apple!
Booyah!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Apple is right.</p>
<p>I think Mozilla&#8217;s CEO is jealous and feels threatened by the possibility that Safari will be installed in more PCs than Firefox is.</p>
<p>Those who think Apple is wrong are assuming that PC users are stupid.  Of course, Mac Users tend to have a higher IQ, are more educated, and are more affluent than PC Users.  But PC Users are not stupid.  They have had to tolerate viruses.  They have had to develop a paranoia about adware, malware, viruses, worms and other infectious software which degrade a PC&#8217;s performance.  Thus they are alert about updates.  It is a simple matter of unchecking Safari if one does not want it.  DUH.  Big deal.</p>
<p>The more Safari is installed and used, the less the grip and monopoly that Microsoft has on the PC World.  Safari is the only browser to have an A+ rating on Acid3.  It is the most standards compliant browser.</p>
<p>You have to fight fire-with-fire sometimes.  Certainly Microsoft has done things that are far more nefarious and Borg-like.  Just browsing the web using Internet Explorer is a huge invitation to install lots of malware on your PC.  Various irritating search bars are examples of some software which can be loaded.  Certainly adware can also be automatically downloaded.</p>
<p>This subject is a tempest in a molehill.  The update is clearly marked and explained.  The user has options &#8211; to install or not install.</p>
<p>Go Apple!<br />
Booyah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli</title>
		<link>http://elihorne.com/journal/why-apples-pc-auto-update-rocks-my-world/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 22:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elihorne.com/?p=212#comment-497</guid>
		<description>I agree with you completely, Peter. I think it is a reasonably self-explanatory situation for those who make conscious decisions about what software to install.

Gruber &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/2008/03/update&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mentions&lt;/a&gt; that perhaps if it wasn&#039;t automatically checked that most of this could have been avoided.  I agree there as well, but I personally think the decision was intentionally.  The same people that would benefit from not having it auto-checked as they rushed through the process are the same that would install it by default and benefit from the end result.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you completely, Peter. I think it is a reasonably self-explanatory situation for those who make conscious decisions about what software to install.</p>
<p>Gruber <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2008/03/update" rel="nofollow">mentions</a> that perhaps if it wasn&#8217;t automatically checked that most of this could have been avoided.  I agree there as well, but I personally think the decision was intentionally.  The same people that would benefit from not having it auto-checked as they rushed through the process are the same that would install it by default and benefit from the end result.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://elihorne.com/journal/why-apples-pc-auto-update-rocks-my-world/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 20:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elihorne.com/?p=212#comment-495</guid>
		<description>While I tend to agree with all those who think what Apple did was, at best, tacky, there is one nice thing that Apple&#039;s Software Updater (Mac and PC) does that, at the very least, makes it a little less evil.

When you go to install, the button says:  &quot;Install 2 Items&quot;

Now, I may be wrong, being a Mac user.  But that seems to be pretty different than what everyone else does.  I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m going &quot;automatically&quot; press that button without thinking, &quot;Hm.  Two items?  Oh, there&#039;s that Safari thing.  Nah, I&#039;m more than happy with Internet Explorer 6.  Think I&#039;ll turn it off.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I tend to agree with all those who think what Apple did was, at best, tacky, there is one nice thing that Apple&#8217;s Software Updater (Mac and PC) does that, at the very least, makes it a little less evil.</p>
<p>When you go to install, the button says:  &#8220;Install 2 Items&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, I may be wrong, being a Mac user.  But that seems to be pretty different than what everyone else does.  I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m going &#8220;automatically&#8221; press that button without thinking, &#8220;Hm.  Two items?  Oh, there&#8217;s that Safari thing.  Nah, I&#8217;m more than happy with Internet Explorer 6.  Think I&#8217;ll turn it off.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
